1973 War Powers Act Essay

1. If no judicial court of authority, namely the linked States Supreme Court, has stricken the 1973 warfare Powers Act and declared it null and negate ingrainedly, how is it that the authors of the text loudness are competent to conclude intercourse has few, if any, war roles rest? How can this be? The law is the law, is it not? (Specifically, explain the political phenomenon that has occurred here and has alike occurred in other legal and constitutional matters allowing the law to be ignored.) The authors of this text book are able to conclude that relation clog has few, if any, war powers remaining because of historical actions.For instance, coitus has not declared war since declination 1941, unless the US has been involved and pursue in many Military Campaigns since 1941 nether the orders of the president. This situation seems to suck come about via many different reasons. One of the reasons that this has happened fit in to our book was that presidents have claime d that they have intrinsical executive director power to defend the nation. A second reason was that when Truman dispatched American forces to Korea without a congressional declaration, and in the face of the emergency, Congress felt it had to acquiesce, and so passed a resoloution favourable reception the presidents actions. This became the pattern for future congressional-executive relations in the militay realm.2. Attempting to think as objectively as possible and placing your political partisan beliefs out (looking at presidents as just that, presidents, as opposed to Democratic or republican presidents) what does the increase in presidential colored military power do to the United States as a nation, for better or worse? (There is no correct answer, yet think through the checks and balances consequences.) As the trace on President Trumans desk, The lodge Stops Here, presidents throughout the years have adhered to their power as chief executive officer with leagal and con stitutional responsiility to ensure that the articles of the composing are faithfully executed, along with the power to appoint, remove and supervise all executive officers etc, the president truly is the true chief executive officer of the US. It seems that this power has been taken literally by the presidents dating all the way back to George Washington. The good in this happening is that i chief has say in what happens.